Senior Executives could be prosecuted for fraud following Government Consultation

Meet the team:

Share this post: linkedin Twitter facebookshare Email
Posted in:Banking and Finance, Litigation|September 13, 2016 | Join the mailing list

Senior corporate executives could be prosecuted for offences including fraud and money laundering carried out by staff under an expansion of laws targeting so-called white-collar crime.

Attorney General Jeremy Wright said the Government is to consult on plans to extend “failure to prevent” offences, currently only covering bribery and tax evasion, to a wider range of economic crimes committed by employees, also including false accounting.[1]

Speaking to the Cambridge Symposium on Economic Crime last month, Wright said:

“When considering the question: where does the buck stop and who is responsible for economic crime? It is clear that the answer is to be found at every level, from the boardroom down. Both corporations and individuals are responsible.”

Changing times?

Current law makes it very difficult to hold corporate boards to account for corporate misconduct by employees; although there now appears to be a turn in the tide. Former LIBOR traders Jay Merchant, Jonathan Matthews and Alex Pabon were sentenced earlier this year to terms of between 33 months and six and a half years for their role in manipulation of LIBOR.

The sentencing of these LIBOR traders fell far shorter than the original 14 year jail term handed out in August 2015 to Tom Hayes, a former UBS LIBOR trader who was also convicted of LIBOR manipulation in the world’s first LIBOR-rigging trial.

What can be done now?

The news of the consultation by the Government will be welcomed by action groups who have campaigned for more responsibility to be placed on the executive of companies.

The prosecution of the LIBOR riggers took substantial time to action. The Banks and financial institutions have been slow to investigate and indeed safeguard their customers from losses caused by activities such as LIBOR rigging and there now must be a change in regulation and accountability.

berg has extensive knowledge in bringing claims for fraud. We have particular experience of advising companies and professional partnerships (including LLPs) in a variety of fraudulent based actions; such as: deceit, fraudulent misrepresentation, bribery, conspiracy, breach of contract and breach of trust.


To find out more about the issues raised in this post, or to discuss any queries regarding banking and financial disputes and regulatory matters get in touch with our Banking and Finance team by emailing or calling +44 (0) 161 829 2599.

The information and opinions contained in this article are not intended to be comprehensive, nor to provide legal advice. No responsibility for its accuracy or correctness is assumed by berg or any of its partners or employees. Professional legal advice should be obtained before taking, or refraining from taking, any action as a result of this article.

Join our mailing list

More from berg


Michelle acted for me as when I was faced with termination of employment under a Settlement agreement.  She quickly got to the core of the matter, provided reassurance about the strength of my positi...

Director of a US multi-national corporation, Employment client,

The ‘energetic’ and ‘efficient’ team at berg includes team head Damian Carter, who is ‘a good tactician and goes the extra mile for his clients'....

Legal 500 2016, Dispute resolution – Commercial litigation